Explore real reports across competitive analysis, pricing research, market sizing, and user needs. See how AIresearchOS delivers research you can actually defend.
We ran an identical deep research prompt on both AIresearchOS and ChatGPT, then had Claude Opus 4.5 evaluate the results. The results speak for themselves.
"Systematically review the evidence on microplastics exposure and human health outcomes: what is known, what is suspected, and what are the critical research gaps?"
Note: AIresearchOS supports Mission Critical mode for maximum depth research. This test used Due Diligence mode.
Deep Research Mode
View the full ChatGPT research output on their platform.
View ChatGPT ResultDue Diligence Research
View the full AIresearchOS research report with all citations.
View AIresearchOS ResultWe fed both research results to Claude Opus 4.5 and asked for an unbiased comparison across five dimensions.
4/5
Categories Won
192
Sources Cited
2×
More Sources
64
Queries Made
201
Key Insights
| Category | ChatGPT | AIresearchOS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | Moderate, qualitative | High, quantitative | AIresearchOS |
| Breadth | Partial coverage | Comprehensive | AIresearchOS |
| Sourcing | ~100, mixed quality | 192+, primary sources | AIresearchOS |
| Factual Accuracy | Generally sound | Generally sound | Tie |
| Submission Choice | — | — | AIresearchOS |
"AIresearchOS wins on academic rigor, comprehensiveness, quantitative precision, regulatory context, source credibility, and actionable insights. The structure follows proper systematic review format with abstract, and covers the most clinically significant microplastics finding to date (HR 4.53 for cardiovascular events) in depth."
Includes 1 rerun if you want to refine your question
Stop shipping decisions based on shallow research. Get a Mission Critical report with 150-300+ sources.
"If it's not cited, it's not defensible."
Includes 1 rerun to refine your question